<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Over The Counter Culture - Latest Comments in An apology &amp;#8211; Facebook frienders</title><link>http://otcc.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://otcc.disqus.com/an_apology_facebook_frienders_37/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:01:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: An apology &amp;#8211; Facebook frienders</title><link>http://www.overthecounterculture.com/2008/an-apology-facebook-frienders-2/#comment-392057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;make sure you don't miss an important point about this effect - it's not a torrent of traffic, like Slashdot, Digg or Yahoo Buzz would send your way. But it was heat-seeking, laser-guided, ultra-relevant traffic - traffic to my About page went up loads. These were people who wanted to find out who I was, what I thought, what value I could be to them, what value they could be to me, what thoughts and views and ideas we could exchange.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For anyone that doesn't give two shits about # of visits (i.e. your site doesn't operate CPM ads), response rate or number of new connects formed - i.e. graph 3 - is the most important metric of the value of "FW effect" traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philippe Bradley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:01:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An apology &amp;#8211; Facebook frienders</title><link>http://www.overthecounterculture.com/2008/an-apology-facebook-frienders-2/#comment-392000</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here you go! &lt;a href="http://www.overthecounterculture.com/2008/social-networking-dividend-of-open-conversation/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.overthecounterculture.com/2008/social-networking-dividend-of-open-conversation/"&gt;http://www.overthecountercu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;the 'Fred Wilson Effect' (though I've framed it as the benefits of open conversation, you're right that FW's high profile was in all likelihood a very important factor; and that informs a thesis I'd like to discuss later, about the benefits of hosting a minor, personal blog like this, vs. using an aggregated comment platform like Disqus, as 'podium' for self-expression and building a digital identity&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philippe Bradley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:51:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An apology &amp;#8211; Facebook frienders</title><link>http://www.overthecounterculture.com/2008/an-apology-facebook-frienders-2/#comment-361228</link><description>&lt;p&gt;edit: I'd like to do that, I'm waiting to see how the data trends over the next few days, to show the spike and tail. OK to wait?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philippe Bradley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:00:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An apology &amp;#8211; Facebook frienders</title><link>http://www.overthecounterculture.com/2008/an-apology-facebook-frienders-2/#comment-361158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd be interested to see the number of visits for OTCC during the days prior to and after Fred's plug--to see the "power of Fred" if you will.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ES</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:48:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>