-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Well, of course contest can improve education... <a rel="follow" href="http://www.onecfd.com">CFD providers</a> have said several times that we need to have...
- This is a quite good summary about india. India is a land of culture. thanks for the summary.
- MIcrophilanthropy...it's here. We have a web based site called iCareCard.org that is makes incremental, transactional contributions to the charity of your choice every time you use our...
- "But he misses the point - innovation isn't an inherent property of music piracy. Case in point - new bands aspire for airplay on (BBC) Radio 1, not your local pirate radio - because Radio...
- "But he misses the point - innovation isn't an inherent property of music piracy. Case in point - new bands aspire for airplay on (BBC) Radio 1, not your local pirate radio - because Radio...
Jump to original thread »
Virgin Media is looking to emulate the ‘French model’ of anti-piracy, big-label protective measures, which sees persistent (three strikes) offenders warned and then kicked off the network. This is old hat stuff but a complex issue. In the post below I make the case th
... Continue reading »
8 months ago
Virgin can't compete with Sky for content. It already tried and, famously, Lost. What remains on Virgin's VOD service is a shadow of the packages Sky offers.
What it *can* compete on is unmoderated bandwidth. Sky (and BT, who run their own VOD service in the form of Vision) have plausible business reasons for kicking file sharers off their networks - they'll do it so they can sell them the content instead. So if Virgin can just give up trying to sell their weak content package they can compete by selling unmoderated bandwidth to file sharers.
I don't see "freeing up bandwidth" as a plausible motive. Bandwidth utilisation follows the standard power laws. If they want to kick the very heaviest users off to free up bandwidth the standard trick is a "fair use" clause. They don't need to threaten most of their users to achieve that. But if they ban everyone from even moderate file-sharing the demand for anything but the smallest pipe seems likely to dry up - who's going to pay for a 10meg pipe just to check email?
So it must be fear of a court case or a change in the laws. That sucks - that a business decision to sell your customers the thing they want is made impossible by a barely-plausible legislative / litigious threat. Yet alas that seems to be where we are.